Artiicial Intelligence and Metaphors of Mind: Within-vehicle Reasoning and Its Beneets*
نویسندگان
چکیده
We de ne within-vehicle and within-tenor reasoning to be reasoning that is done on-they within the vehicle domain or tenor domain, respectively, of a conceptual metaphor, during the comprehension of utterances that manifest the metaphor. The main claim of this paper is that, at least in Arti cial Intelligence systems for understanding metaphorical discourse, within-vehicle reasoning is often bene cial. Indeed, in several important respects it is to be preferred over within-tenor reasoning that would achieve the same overall e ect; and in any case for certain types of metaphorical sentence there is useful within-vehicle reasoning that can be done but for which there is no feasible within-tenor parallel. Although some work on metaphor involves within-vehicle reasoning, its bene ts do not appear to have been explained and argued. The examples in the present paper focus on metaphors for the particular domain of mental states and processes; also, the examples involve only metaphors that are already familiar to the understander. However, these restrictions are not essential to the arguments. 2
منابع مشابه
Evaluating the design based approach
The design based approach has been repeatedly advocated by Sloman as a methodology for Artiicial Intelligence and Cognitive Science. It is intended to be used as an approach to the study of complex control systems such as the mind (a view of mind which diiers from the standard computational one). This paper summarises this approach together with its supporting philosophical underpinning by draw...
متن کاملCollective Intelligence of the Artificial Life Community on Its Own Successes, Failures, and Future
We describe a novel Internet-based method for building consensus and clarifying connicts in large stakeholder groups facing complex issues, and we use the method to survey and map the scientiic and organizational perspectives of the artiicial life community during the Seventh International Conference on Artiicial Life (summer 2000). The issues addressed in this survey included artiicial life's ...
متن کاملCombining Simulative and Metaphor-Based Reasoning about Beliefs
An unprecedented combination of simulative and metaphor-based reasoning about beliefs is achieved in an AI system, ATT-Meta. Much mundane discourse about beliefs uses conceptual metaphors (e.g., MIND AS CONTAINER) productively, and ATT-Meta's metaphor-based reasoning accordingly leads to crucial discourse comprehension decisions. ATT-Meta's non-metaphorical mode of belief reasoning includes sim...
متن کاملReasoned Assumptions and Rational
Logical epistemology unduly sways theories of thinking that formulate problems of nonmonotonic reasoning as issues of nondeductive operations on logically phrased beliefs, because the fundamental concepts underlying such reasoning have little to do with logic or belief. These formulations make the resulting theories inappropriately special and hide the characteristic structures of nonmonotonic ...
متن کاملL2 Learners’ Stylistic Penchant and Perceived Aptness for Metaphors and Similes
Aptness, defined as how the vehicle is well able to cover the salient features of the tenor (e.g., oil is like liquid gold vs. a train is like a worm), is claimed to be an important factor in the preference for metaphors over similes, or vice versa. This study was an attempt to test for the supposed correlation between the perceived degree of aptness and a priori stylistic preference for metaph...
متن کامل